Meta kategorie

[pionl]

Aktuálně metakategorie se vložili do kategpriích ale pocitově tam nemají co dělat.

Co jsem pochopil, tak to má spojit kategorie a vytvořit "nad kategorii".

Správně má být meta kategorie ve vlastním AirTable seznamu a místo v jsonu categories by to mělo být třeba meta_categories.

Takto se to ohnulo a muselo se přidat filtrace isMetaOnly apod. Další prostor udělat chybu jak v AirTable tak i v kódu.

cc @met @kubito @vchlum

[met]

Přidávám @JuroUhlar který metakategorie řeší.
Juraj to chtěl tenhle víkend doladit, přejmenovat "metacategories" na "subcategories", čímž by to dávalo smysl.

viz vlákno ve Slacku https://cesko-digital.slack.com/archives/C03BYED3ARK/p1684659317880859

[JuroUhlar]

@pionl Yes it's a mess right now. I proposed renaming the "meta categories" to "subcategories", deleting the "meta_only" boolean, and relying on checking if the category has phrases.length > 0 or subcategories.length > 0 it shouldn't have both.

We could separate meta categories into their own table but @met is counting with multiple nesting levels in the future, so maybe having it all in one table is more flexible. Let me know what you think, open to other ideeas how to structure it. If we agree, I can fix it this weekend.

[pionl]

Depends how dictionary should be shown. If the "subcategories" will not be in dictionary, then it should not be in categories and it should be in separate part. This would make quite a mess in long term and is better to separate it

But, its up on you at this moment :) Both approaches are doable but first approach could be more open to bugs :)

[met]

@pionl For now subcategories are not in dictionary. But the idea is in the end to show them in dictionary (still need to figure how we want to do it).