Lower level device management example #45
rFronteddu
started this conversation in
Ideas
Replies: 2 comments
-
|
I guess https://github.com/freeconf/examples/tree/master/node-extend could be the example I am looking for. We could add a readme to the examples project explaining what each example shows to make navigating easier. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
-
|
re: Example for building management code
I just pushed update to new reflection API
https://freeconf.org/docs/examples/next-step/
re: Example README
This is pretty good legend to the examples
https://freeconf.org/docs/examples/
re: callbacks, structs,....
I am not exactly following you, but it might be easier to build some code
and then point to a particular issue you are seeing.
…On Sun, Aug 27, 2023 at 3:40 PM Roberto Fronteddu ***@***.***> wrote:
I guess https://github.com/freeconf/examples/tree/master/node-extend
could be the example I am looking for. We could add a readme to the
examples project explaining what each example shows to make navigating
easier.
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#45 (comment)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAACA7XAES4HLCFGKJ2Z4QLXXOPCRANCNFSM6AAAAAA4AQFV5Q>
.
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.Message
ID: ***@***.***>
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
I am trying to figure out how to have more control over the structure managed by Restconf. I am aware that I must define a better "manage" function but I am worried that the process will be time-consuming since I couldn't find clear examples of that.
For example, I could use an example of how I can lock updates and how I could save info inside a db instead of relying on a go structure.
I am also wondering if it wouldn't be easier to define the library in terms of callbacks and endpoints instead of feeding it a go struct and then managing the interaction with it. For example, I was imagining that if you have a field speed, you could have two callbacks one to get the value and one to update the value. Hopefully, I am not saying anything too silly :).
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions