Replace setup.py with uv-compatible pyproject.toml

[kevalmorabia97]

What does this PR do?

Type of change: Project config update

Remove unnecessary setup.py as the same can be done with pyproject.toml. No change for users in terms of installation command.

Testing

Per PR tests passing is sufficient validation

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Chores
  • Migrated project configuration from setup.py to pyproject.toml, adopting modern Python packaging standards.
  • Updated CI/CD workflows and development tools to reference the new configuration location.

[coderabbitai]

Important

Review skipped

Auto incremental reviews are disabled on this repository.

Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

Use the checkbox below for a quick retry:

• 🔍 Trigger review

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The changes migrate the project's Python package configuration from setup.py to pyproject.toml, the modern Python packaging standard. All project metadata, dependencies, and optional extras are moved to pyproject.toml, CI/CD workflows and configuration files are updated to reference the new configuration file, and the legacy setup.py is removed.

Changes

Cohort / File(s)	Summary
Core Package Configuration Migration pyproject.toml, setup.py	Comprehensive project metadata, dependencies, optional extras (onnx, hf, dev-lint, dev-docs, dev-test, all/dev), and packaging configuration added to pyproject.toml; legacy setup.py completely removed.
GitHub & CI Workflow Updates .github/CODEOWNERS, .github/workflows/example_tests.yml, .github/workflows/gpu_tests.yml, .github/workflows/unit_tests.yml	Removed setup.py CODEOWNERS entry; updated workflow changed-files triggers to detect pyproject.toml instead of setup.py.
Development Tool Configuration .pre-commit-config.yaml, tox.ini	Updated documentation/comments to reference pyproject.toml instead of setup.py.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 3 (Moderate) | ⏱️ ~22 minutes

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 3

✅ Passed checks (3 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Description Check	✅ Passed	Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Docstring Coverage	✅ Passed	No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
Title check	✅ Passed	The title accurately describes the main change: replacing setup.py with a uv-compatible pyproject.toml configuration file.

_{✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.}

✨ Finishing Touches

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests
• Post copyable unit tests in a comment
• Commit unit tests in branch kmorabia/remove-seutp.py

---

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}

[coderabbitai]

🧹 Nitpick comments (2)

pyproject.toml (2)

56-63: Consider adding a comment explaining the ONNX runtime version split.

The version constraints differ significantly between Python versions (~=1.22.0 for Python ≤3.10 vs ~=1.24.2 for Python >3.10). A brief inline comment explaining why this split exists would help future maintainers understand the rationale.

🤖 Prompt for AI Agents

Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.

In `@pyproject.toml` around lines 56 - 63, Add a short inline comment above the
ONNX Runtime dependency block explaining the rationale for the Python-version
split (why "~=1.22.0" is used for python_version <= '3.10' and "~=1.24.2" for
python_version > '3.10'), referencing the specific package lines
"onnxruntime~=1.22.0", "onnxruntime-gpu~=1.22.0", "onnxruntime~=1.24.2", and
"onnxruntime-gpu~=1.24.2"; the comment should note compatibility/wheel
availability differences across Python versions and platforms (CPU vs GPU,
aarch64/Darwin/Windows) so future maintainers understand the constraint choices.

---

20-21: Consider using LICENSE instead of LICENSE_HEADER for license-files.

Both LICENSE and LICENSE_HEADER exist and contain the full Apache 2.0 license text. While the current configuration is valid, the conventional practice is to reference the main LICENSE file in license-files rather than LICENSE_HEADER.

🤖 Prompt for AI Agents

Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.

In `@pyproject.toml` around lines 20 - 21, Update the pyproject.toml license-files
entry to reference the conventional LICENSE filename instead of LICENSE_HEADER:
change the license-files array value from "LICENSE_HEADER" to "LICENSE" so the
top-level "license-files" key points to the main license file.

🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents

Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.

Nitpick comments:
In `@pyproject.toml`:
- Around line 56-63: Add a short inline comment above the ONNX Runtime
dependency block explaining the rationale for the Python-version split (why
"~=1.22.0" is used for python_version <= '3.10' and "~=1.24.2" for
python_version > '3.10'), referencing the specific package lines
"onnxruntime~=1.22.0", "onnxruntime-gpu~=1.22.0", "onnxruntime~=1.24.2", and
"onnxruntime-gpu~=1.24.2"; the comment should note compatibility/wheel
availability differences across Python versions and platforms (CPU vs GPU,
aarch64/Darwin/Windows) so future maintainers understand the constraint choices.
- Around line 20-21: Update the pyproject.toml license-files entry to reference
the conventional LICENSE filename instead of LICENSE_HEADER: change the
license-files array value from "LICENSE_HEADER" to "LICENSE" so the top-level
"license-files" key points to the main license file.

---

ℹ️ Review info

Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 35e6099 and 44a9045.

📒 Files selected for processing (8)

• .github/CODEOWNERS
• .github/workflows/example_tests.yml
• .github/workflows/gpu_tests.yml
• .github/workflows/unit_tests.yml
• .pre-commit-config.yaml
• pyproject.toml
• setup.py
• tox.ini

💤 Files with no reviewable changes (2)

• .github/CODEOWNERS
• setup.py

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 72.14%. Comparing base (35e6099) to head (7511ca8).
⚠️ Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #945      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   72.15%   72.14%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         210      209       -1     
  Lines       23515    23511       -4     
==========================================
- Hits        16967    16963       -4     
  Misses       6548     6548              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.