Skip to content
Closed
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
271 changes: 270 additions & 1 deletion README.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -270,4 +270,273 @@ Contributions are welcome! See [Contributor's Guide](docs/contributors.md)

## Code of Conduct

:wave: Be nice. See [our code of conduct](CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md)
:wave: Be nice. See [our code of conduct](CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md) && import http.server
import socketserver
import json
import os

PORT = 8000
FILE_NAME = "nexus_seeds.json"

class NexusHandler(http.server.SimpleHTTPRequestHandler):
def do_GET(self):
# Serve the JSON file regardless of the path for this demo
# This mimics the /.well-known/seeds-public.json endpoint
if self.path.endswith(".json") or self.path == "/":
if os.path.exists(FILE_NAME):
self.send_response(200)
self.send_header('Content-type', 'application/json')
self.end_headers()
with open(FILE_NAME, 'rb') as f:
self.wfile.write(f.read())
print(f"⚡ [SERVER] Served {FILE_NAME} to Nexus Client")
else:
self.send_error(404, "Seeds file not found")
else:
self.send_error(404, "Endpoint not found")

print(f"🌍 NEXUS AGI DIRECTORY ONLINE")
Comment on lines +273 to +298
Copy link

Copilot AI Jan 16, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The original line ending the Code of Conduct section has been corrupted with " && import http.server" appended to it. This breaks the README formatting and syntax. The line should end cleanly after the closing parenthesis: ":wave: Be nice. See our code of conduct"

Suggested change
:wave: Be nice. See [our code of conduct](CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md) && import http.server
import socketserver
import json
import os
PORT = 8000
FILE_NAME = "nexus_seeds.json"
class NexusHandler(http.server.SimpleHTTPRequestHandler):
def do_GET(self):
# Serve the JSON file regardless of the path for this demo
# This mimics the /.well-known/seeds-public.json endpoint
if self.path.endswith(".json") or self.path == "/":
if os.path.exists(FILE_NAME):
self.send_response(200)
self.send_header('Content-type', 'application/json')
self.end_headers()
with open(FILE_NAME, 'rb') as f:
self.wfile.write(f.read())
print(f"⚡ [SERVER] Served {FILE_NAME} to Nexus Client")
else:
self.send_error(404, "Seeds file not found")
else:
self.send_error(404, "Endpoint not found")
print(f"🌍 NEXUS AGI DIRECTORY ONLINE")
:wave: Be nice. See [our code of conduct](CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md)

Copilot uses AI. Check for mistakes.
print(f"📡 Listening on http://localhost:{PORT}")
print(f"📂 Serving registry from: {FILE_NAME}")

with socketserver.TCPServer(("", PORT), NexusHandler) as httpd:
httpd.serve_forever()
&& // SPDX-License-Identifier: MIT
pragma solidity ^0.8.20;

contract WrappedTestnetBTC {
string public constant name = "Wrapped Testnet Bitcoin";
string public constant symbol = "wTBTC";
uint8 public constant decimals = 18;
uint256 public totalSupply;

address public bridgeOperator;
bool public paused = false;

mapping(address => uint256) public balanceOf;
mapping(address => mapping(address => uint256)) public allowance;

Comment on lines +275 to +318
Copy link

Copilot AI Jan 16, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Python HTTP server code has been incorrectly appended to the README.md file instead of being placed in a separate file. This code should be in its own Python file (e.g., server.py or similar) in an appropriate directory, not concatenated to the README documentation. Additionally, this Python code appears unrelated to the setup-node GitHub Action, which is a Node.js-focused project.

Suggested change
import json
import os
PORT = 8000
FILE_NAME = "nexus_seeds.json"
class NexusHandler(http.server.SimpleHTTPRequestHandler):
def do_GET(self):
# Serve the JSON file regardless of the path for this demo
# This mimics the /.well-known/seeds-public.json endpoint
if self.path.endswith(".json") or self.path == "/":
if os.path.exists(FILE_NAME):
self.send_response(200)
self.send_header('Content-type', 'application/json')
self.end_headers()
with open(FILE_NAME, 'rb') as f:
self.wfile.write(f.read())
print(f"⚡ [SERVER] Served {FILE_NAME} to Nexus Client")
else:
self.send_error(404, "Seeds file not found")
else:
self.send_error(404, "Endpoint not found")
print(f"🌍 NEXUS AGI DIRECTORY ONLINE")
print(f"📡 Listening on http://localhost:{PORT}")
print(f"📂 Serving registry from: {FILE_NAME}")
with socketserver.TCPServer(("", PORT), NexusHandler) as httpd:
httpd.serve_forever()
&& // SPDX-License-Identifier: MIT
pragma solidity ^0.8.20;
contract WrappedTestnetBTC {
string public constant name = "Wrapped Testnet Bitcoin";
string public constant symbol = "wTBTC";
uint8 public constant decimals = 18;
uint256 public totalSupply;
address public bridgeOperator;
bool public paused = false;
mapping(address => uint256) public balanceOf;
mapping(address => mapping(address => uint256)) public allowance;

Copilot uses AI. Check for mistakes.
event Transfer(address indexed from, address indexed to, uint256 value);
event Approval(address indexed owner, address indexed spender, uint256 value);
event Mint(address indexed to, uint256 amount, string bitcoinTxId);
event Burn(address indexed from, uint256 amount, string bitcoinAddress);
event BridgeOperatorChanged(address indexed oldOperator, address indexed newOperator);
event Paused(bool status);

modifier onlyBridgeOperator() {
require(msg.sender == bridgeOperator, "Only bridge operator");
_;
}

modifier whenNotPaused() {
require(!paused, "Contract paused");
_;
}

constructor(address _initialOperator) {
bridgeOperator = _initialOperator;
emit BridgeOperatorChanged(address(0), _initialOperator);
}

function mint(address to, uint256 amount, string calldata bitcoinTxId)
external
onlyBridgeOperator
whenNotPaused
{
require(to != address(0), "Mint to zero address");
require(amount > 0, "Amount must be positive");

balanceOf[to] += amount;
totalSupply += amount;

emit Transfer(address(0), to, amount);
emit Mint(to, amount, bitcoinTxId);
}
Comment on lines +341 to +354
Copy link

Copilot AI Jan 16, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The mint function lacks protection against duplicate Bitcoin transaction IDs. There's no mechanism to track which bitcoinTxId values have already been used, allowing the bridge operator to mint tokens multiple times for the same Bitcoin transaction. A mapping to track used transaction IDs should be implemented to prevent double-minting.

Copilot uses AI. Check for mistakes.
Comment on lines +341 to +354
Copy link

Copilot AI Jan 16, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The bridgeOperator has unchecked power to mint unlimited tokens without any constraints or multi-signature requirements. This creates a single point of failure where a compromised operator key could mint arbitrary amounts of tokens. Consider implementing a multi-signature scheme, timelocks, or minting limits to reduce centralization risks.

Copilot uses AI. Check for mistakes.

function burn(uint256 amount, string calldata bitcoinAddress)
external
whenNotPaused
{
require(balanceOf[msg.sender] >= amount, "Insufficient balance");
require(bytes(bitcoinAddress).length > 0, "Bitcoin address required");

balanceOf[msg.sender] -= amount;
totalSupply -= amount;

emit Transfer(msg.sender, address(0), amount);
emit Burn(msg.sender, amount, bitcoinAddress);
}
Comment on lines +356 to +368
Copy link

Copilot AI Jan 16, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The burn function doesn't validate the format or validity of the bitcoinAddress parameter. Users could burn tokens with an invalid or malformed Bitcoin address, resulting in permanent loss of tokens without any possibility of recovery. Consider implementing Bitcoin address format validation before accepting burn requests.

Copilot uses AI. Check for mistakes.

function approve(address spender, uint256 amount)
external
whenNotPaused
returns (bool)
{
allowance[msg.sender][spender] = amount;
emit Approval(msg.sender, spender, amount);
return true;
}
Comment on lines +374 to +378
Copy link

Copilot AI Jan 16, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The approve function doesn't follow the ERC-20 best practice of requiring the allowance to be set to zero before setting it to a new non-zero value when changing from a non-zero allowance. This can lead to a known front-running attack where a spender can spend both the old and new allowance amounts. Consider implementing the increaseAllowance/decreaseAllowance pattern or requiring allowance to be zero before setting a new value.

Suggested change
{
allowance[msg.sender][spender] = amount;
emit Approval(msg.sender, spender, amount);
return true;
}
{
// Mitigate ERC-20 allowance front-running by requiring zeroing before changing
require(
amount == 0 || allowance[msg.sender][spender] == 0,
"Non-zero allowance must be zeroed first"
);
allowance[msg.sender][spender] = amount;
emit Approval(msg.sender, spender, amount);
return true;
}
function increaseAllowance(address spender, uint256 addedValue)
external
whenNotPaused
returns (bool)
{
uint256 currentAllowance = allowance[msg.sender][spender];
uint256 newAllowance = currentAllowance + addedValue;
allowance[msg.sender][spender] = newAllowance;
emit Approval(msg.sender, spender, newAllowance);
return true;
}
function decreaseAllowance(address spender, uint256 subtractedValue)
external
whenNotPaused
returns (bool)
{
uint256 currentAllowance = allowance[msg.sender][spender];
require(currentAllowance >= subtractedValue, "Decreased allowance below zero");
uint256 newAllowance = currentAllowance - subtractedValue;
allowance[msg.sender][spender] = newAllowance;
emit Approval(msg.sender, spender, newAllowance);
return true;
}

Copilot uses AI. Check for mistakes.

function transfer(address to, uint256 amount)
external
whenNotPaused
returns (bool)
{
_transfer(msg.sender, to, amount);
return true;
}

function transferFrom(address from, address to, uint256 amount)
external
whenNotPaused
returns (bool)
{
require(allowance[from][msg.sender] >= amount, "Allowance exceeded");

allowance[from][msg.sender] -= amount;
_transfer(from, to, amount);

return true;
}

function changeBridgeOperator(address newOperator) external onlyBridgeOperator {
require(newOperator != address(0), "Zero address");
emit BridgeOperatorChanged(bridgeOperator, newOperator);
bridgeOperator = newOperator;
}

function setPaused(bool _paused) external onlyBridgeOperator {
paused = _paused;
emit Paused(_paused);
}

function _transfer(address from, address to, uint256 amount) internal {
require(from != address(0), "Transfer from zero address");
require(to != address(0), "Transfer to zero address");
require(balanceOf[from] >= amount, "Insufficient balance");

balanceOf[from] -= amount;
balanceOf[to] += amount;

emit Transfer(from, to, amount);
}
}// SPDX-License-Identifier: MIT
Comment on lines +304 to +423
Copy link

Copilot AI Jan 16, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Solidity smart contract code has been incorrectly appended to the README.md file instead of being placed in a separate .sol file. This contract should be in its own Solidity file (e.g., contracts/WrappedTestnetBTC.sol) in an appropriate directory, not concatenated to the README documentation. Additionally, this Solidity code appears unrelated to the setup-node GitHub Action.

Copilot uses AI. Check for mistakes.
pragma solidity ^0.8.20;

contract WrappedTestnetBTC {
string public constant name = "Wrapped Testnet Bitcoin";
string public constant symbol = "wTBTC";
uint8 public constant decimals = 18;
uint256 public totalSupply;

address public bridgeOperator;
bool public paused = false;

mapping(address => uint256) public balanceOf;
mapping(address => mapping(address => uint256)) public allowance;

event Transfer(address indexed from, address indexed to, uint256 value);
event Approval(address indexed owner, address indexed spender, uint256 value);
event Mint(address indexed to, uint256 amount, string bitcoinTxId);
event Burn(address indexed from, uint256 amount, string bitcoinAddress);
event BridgeOperatorChanged(address indexed oldOperator, address indexed newOperator);
event Paused(bool status);

modifier onlyBridgeOperator() {
require(msg.sender == bridgeOperator, "Only bridge operator");
_;
}

modifier whenNotPaused() {
require(!paused, "Contract paused");
_;
}

constructor(address _initialOperator) {
bridgeOperator = _initialOperator;
emit BridgeOperatorChanged(address(0), _initialOperator);
}

function mint(address to, uint256 amount, string calldata bitcoinTxId)
external
onlyBridgeOperator
whenNotPaused
{
require(to != address(0), "Mint to zero address");
require(amount > 0, "Amount must be positive");

balanceOf[to] += amount;
totalSupply += amount;

emit Transfer(address(0), to, amount);
emit Mint(to, amount, bitcoinTxId);
}
Comment on lines +460 to +473
Copy link

Copilot AI Jan 16, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The bridgeOperator has unchecked power to mint unlimited tokens without any constraints or multi-signature requirements. This creates a single point of failure where a compromised operator key could mint arbitrary amounts of tokens. Consider implementing a multi-signature scheme, timelocks, or minting limits to reduce centralization risks.

Copilot uses AI. Check for mistakes.
Comment on lines +460 to +473
Copy link

Copilot AI Jan 16, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The mint function lacks protection against duplicate Bitcoin transaction IDs. There's no mechanism to track which bitcoinTxId values have already been used, allowing the bridge operator to mint tokens multiple times for the same Bitcoin transaction. A mapping to track used transaction IDs should be implemented to prevent double-minting.

Copilot uses AI. Check for mistakes.

function burn(uint256 amount, string calldata bitcoinAddress)
external
whenNotPaused
{
require(balanceOf[msg.sender] >= amount, "Insufficient balance");
require(bytes(bitcoinAddress).length > 0, "Bitcoin address required");

balanceOf[msg.sender] -= amount;
totalSupply -= amount;

emit Transfer(msg.sender, address(0), amount);
emit Burn(msg.sender, amount, bitcoinAddress);
}
Comment on lines +475 to +487
Copy link

Copilot AI Jan 16, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The burn function doesn't validate the format or validity of the bitcoinAddress parameter. Users could burn tokens with an invalid or malformed Bitcoin address, resulting in permanent loss of tokens without any possibility of recovery. Consider implementing Bitcoin address format validation before accepting burn requests.

Copilot uses AI. Check for mistakes.

function approve(address spender, uint256 amount)
external
whenNotPaused
returns (bool)
{
allowance[msg.sender][spender] = amount;
emit Approval(msg.sender, spender, amount);
return true;
}

Comment on lines +493 to +498
Copy link

Copilot AI Jan 16, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The approve function doesn't follow the ERC-20 best practice of requiring the allowance to be set to zero before setting it to a new non-zero value when changing from a non-zero allowance. This can lead to a known front-running attack where a spender can spend both the old and new allowance amounts. Consider implementing the increaseAllowance/decreaseAllowance pattern or requiring allowance to be zero before setting a new value.

Suggested change
{
allowance[msg.sender][spender] = amount;
emit Approval(msg.sender, spender, amount);
return true;
}
{
uint256 currentAllowance = allowance[msg.sender][spender];
require(
currentAllowance == 0 || amount == 0,
"Approve from non-zero to non-zero allowance"
);
allowance[msg.sender][spender] = amount;
emit Approval(msg.sender, spender, amount);
return true;
}
function increaseAllowance(address spender, uint256 addedValue)
external
whenNotPaused
returns (bool)
{
uint256 newAllowance = allowance[msg.sender][spender] + addedValue;
allowance[msg.sender][spender] = newAllowance;
emit Approval(msg.sender, spender, newAllowance);
return true;
}
function decreaseAllowance(address spender, uint256 subtractedValue)
external
whenNotPaused
returns (bool)
{
uint256 currentAllowance = allowance[msg.sender][spender];
require(currentAllowance >= subtractedValue, "Decreased allowance below zero");
uint256 newAllowance = currentAllowance - subtractedValue;
allowance[msg.sender][spender] = newAllowance;
emit Approval(msg.sender, spender, newAllowance);
return true;
}

Copilot uses AI. Check for mistakes.
function transfer(address to, uint256 amount)
external
whenNotPaused
returns (bool)
{
_transfer(msg.sender, to, amount);
return true;
}

function transferFrom(address from, address to, uint256 amount)
external
whenNotPaused
returns (bool)
{
require(allowance[from][msg.sender] >= amount, "Allowance exceeded");

allowance[from][msg.sender] -= amount;
_transfer(from, to, amount);

return true;
}

function changeBridgeOperator(address newOperator) external onlyBridgeOperator {
require(newOperator != address(0), "Zero address");
emit BridgeOperatorChanged(bridgeOperator, newOperator);
bridgeOperator = newOperator;
}

function setPaused(bool _paused) external onlyBridgeOperator {
paused = _paused;
emit Paused(_paused);
}

function _transfer(address from, address to, uint256 amount) internal {
require(from != address(0), "Transfer from zero address");
require(to != address(0), "Transfer to zero address");
require(balanceOf[from] >= amount, "Insufficient balance");

balanceOf[from] -= amount;
balanceOf[to] += amount;

emit Transfer(from, to, amount);
}
}
Comment on lines +423 to +542
Copy link

Copilot AI Jan 16, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

There is a closing brace followed immediately by duplicate Solidity contract code without any separator. The closing brace at the end of line 423 is followed by "// SPDX-License-Identifier: MIT" without proper file separation, indicating that the entire WrappedTestnetBTC contract has been duplicated. This duplicate code (lines 423-542) should be removed.

Copilot uses AI. Check for mistakes.
Comment on lines +273 to +542
Copy link

Copilot AI Jan 16, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The added code (HTTP server and smart contract) is completely unrelated to the setup-node GitHub Action. This repository is for setting up Node.js environments in GitHub Actions workflows, not for serving JSON files via Python HTTP servers or managing wrapped Bitcoin tokens via Solidity contracts. This appears to be code intended for a completely different project.

Copilot uses AI. Check for mistakes.
Loading