Skip to content

Conversation

@ramitg254
Copy link
Contributor

@ramitg254 ramitg254 commented Jan 7, 2026

…for Iceberg table

What changes were proposed in this pull request?

Adds support for using partition spec with describe statement for iceberg table.
and updated the other test outputs as partition information is also gettting printed for desc statement after the changes

Why are the changes needed?

currently using partition spec with describe statement for iceberg table result in unsupported exception

Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?

yes, this statement will not result in exception anymore

How was this patch tested?

build locally and ci tests and added q tests

@ramitg254 ramitg254 changed the title [WIP]HIVE-29376:Using partition spec in DESC FORMATTED sql is unsupported … HIVE-29376:Using partition spec in DESC FORMATTED sql is unsupported … Jan 8, 2026
return null;
}

private Partition getPartition(Table tab, Map<String, String> partitionSpec) throws HiveException {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The logic here is almost same as getPartition() in DescTableOperation.java https://github.com/apache/hive/pull/6259/changes#diff-641c62b42b01bff41c89a3b3661c15d6c08fce0e48740347f36fe32448984147R131

Check if you can add them in an utility so it can be reused

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for checking it, moved out this logic from DescTableOperation.java and DescTableAnalyzer.java to HiveIcebergStorageHandler.java
https://github.com/apache/hive/pull/6259/changes#diff-93864ecf035fe51b92185015da842a56837cea89064813de39c278c6f8fed03cR2079
please take a look

Copy link
Contributor

@soumyakanti3578 soumyakanti3578 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

DDLUtils.isIcebergTable() has been used in many places in the compiler. I think we should not use a specific table type here.

}

private Partition getPartition(Table tab, Map<String, String> partitionSpec) throws HiveException {
boolean isIcebergTable = DDLUtils.isIcebergTable(tab);
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please don't use DDLUtils.isIcebergTable as this API in the compiler is too specific. Instead please use tab.isNonNative() in conjunction to other APIs if needed.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for checking it, tried to make changes more generic to non native tables instead of iceberg centric please take a look

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@ramitg254, consider joining with Table.hasNonNativePartitionSupport

try {
List<String> partNames = getPartitionNames(icebergTable, partitionSpec, false);
return !partNames.isEmpty() &&
Warehouse.makePartName(partitionSpec, false).equals(partNames.getFirst());
Copy link
Member

@deniskuzZ deniskuzZ Jan 19, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

do we really need
Warehouse.makePartName(partitionSpec, false).equals(partNames.getFirst())
check?
isn't !partNames.isEmpty() enough? we already pass the partitionSpec to getPartitionNames

Copy link
Contributor Author

@ramitg254 ramitg254 Jan 19, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

But let's say for eg. for partspec is c=6 and parts available are c=6/d=hello6 only, then we would like to throw partition not found exception and that's why .equals is required as well

Copy link
Member

@deniskuzZ deniskuzZ Jan 20, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

makes sense, but could we please do minor refactor and move the whole getPartition into IcebergTableUtil?

  public static Partition getPartition(Configuration conf,
      org.apache.hadoop.hive.ql.metadata.Table table, Map<String, String> partitionSpec)
      throws SemanticException {
    List<String> partNames =
        getPartitionNames(conf, table, partitionSpec, false);

    if (partNames.isEmpty()) {
      return null;
    }

    try {
      String expectedName = Warehouse.makePartName(partitionSpec, false);
      if (!expectedName.equals(partNames.getFirst())) {
        return null;
      }
      return new DummyPartition(table, expectedName, partitionSpec);
    } catch (MetaException e) {
      throw new SemanticException("Unable to construct dummy partition", e);
    }
  }
  
  public static List<String> getPartitionNames(Configuration conf,
      org.apache.hadoop.hive.ql.metadata.Table table, Map<String, String> partSpecMap,
      boolean latestSpecOnly) throws SemanticException {
    Table icebergTable = getTable(conf, table.getTTable());
   ....
   }

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

also please drop Boolean.TRUE.equals(latestSpecOnly) and Boolean.FALSE.equals(latestSpecOnly)

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@ramitg254, please check this, i think that the only remaining

Copy link
Contributor Author

@ramitg254 ramitg254 Jan 20, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

so either if we are moving it then hms table should be used as parameter
if you thing iceberg table as parameter for method to be used then moving it won't be good IMO

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

my bad, I saw some method have hms table as param as well, I'll update it

Copy link
Contributor Author

@ramitg254 ramitg254 Jan 20, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

done, moved getPartition but kept hasPartition as it can have its idependent use case as well instead of keeping all of it in getPartition

Copy link
Member

@deniskuzZ deniskuzZ Jan 20, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

please drop hasPartition, and use the snippet attached (i.e. it doesn't have any other usages).

Note, it requires getPartitionNames signature change as well to use Configuration conf, org.apache.hadoop.hive.ql.metadata.Table.

but it should have iceberg table as parameter instead of hms table

no, it shouldn't. hms table is just fine

IcebergTableUtil.getTable is duplicated in 2 caller methods, should be dropped.
Please check the complete snippet above

Copy link
Contributor Author

@ramitg254 ramitg254 Jan 21, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

done, used the snippet just a change was needed in the snippet needed to move

List<String> partNames =
        getPartitionNames(conf, table, partitionSpec, false);

    if (partNames.isEmpty()) {
      return null;
    }

inside try block as well as it can throw :

Caused by: org.apache.hadoop.hive.ql.parse.SemanticException: No partition column by the name: pcol
 at org.apache.iceberg.mr.hive.IcebergTableUtil.generateExpressionFromPartitionSpec

from generateExpressionFromPartitionSpec in getPartitionNames when executedexplain insert queries so needed to catch that exception and return null as well

List<FieldSchema> partitionColumns = table.isPartitioned() ? table.getPartCols() : null;
List<FieldSchema> partitionColumns = null;
if (table.isPartitioned()) {
partitionColumns = table.hasNonNativePartitionSupport() ?
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

not sure, but maybe we could move hasNonNativePartitionSupport logic inside of Table#getPartCols() , similar to

  public List<String> getPartColNames() {
    List<FieldSchema> partCols = hasNonNativePartitionSupport() ?
        getStorageHandler().getPartitionKeys(this) : getPartCols();
    return partCols.stream().map(FieldSchema::getName)
      .collect(Collectors.toList());
  }

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

If you can check this - would be great, but i think there was some issue. we might handle this in the follow-up, just trying to avoid code duplication

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

yes actually my first approach was to do this only but there were issues regarding when statistics were computed after insertion resulting in index out of bound exception as that is dependent getPartCols but this is the only one known to me but there can be other scenarios where it is getting used and can cause issues so avoiding this for now.
and will tackle this code duplication once we have updated implementation of getPartCols with a follow up ticket

List<String> values = new ArrayList<String>();
for (FieldSchema fs : this.getTable().getPartCols()) {
for (FieldSchema fs :
table.hasNonNativePartitionSupport() ?
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

same here

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copy link
Member

@deniskuzZ deniskuzZ left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, left minor comments

}
}

public static boolean hasPartition(Table icebergTable,
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

please drop this, and use the snippet attached

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

done, dropped

@sonarqubecloud
Copy link

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants