Use shadow width instead of custom size #437
Merged
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What we currently achieve by setting a custom size via our wayland protocol is actually supported by default in wayland via the shadow width which maps to frame rect and buffer rect in mutter. I only found out about shadow width recently so I always thought frame rect and buffer rect are somewhat broken or rather use something else 😬
Setting the shadow width ourselves allows us to remove the custom size method from our wayland protocol and the custom rect handling which has caused a few issues in the past because of wrong coordinate conversion on different scaling factors and methods. (See elementary/wingpanel#568, elementary/wingpanel#594, elementary/gala#2139, etc.)
Fixes #351 (On X that requires a dock restart for some reason? I think that's due to a bug in gala but I will investigate in a follow up since ig it's at least better than main)