-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 178
Leo/cross mesh non lagrange #4804
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
leo-collins
wants to merge
23
commits into
main
Choose a base branch
from
leo/cross-mesh-non-lagrange
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
+330
−125
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
23 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
21e7b52
enable tests
leo-collins 4250df3
remove check
leo-collins 92d96dd
add test
leo-collins 7be0dbe
update test
leo-collins 39ad2b6
update tests
leo-collins d66a086
WIP
leo-collins 3cf1234
fix test
leo-collins 6582e84
WIP
leo-collins 968b61d
fix target_space
leo-collins df430f5
two-form assembly working
leo-collins 25e3713
forward and adjoint one-form
leo-collins cce766b
fixes
leo-collins 989eab0
working
leo-collins 2917f1f
add zero-form test
leo-collins 8635d0b
fix tests
leo-collins ac27a7a
docs
leo-collins 4f0f382
fixes
leo-collins c29e6b7
fix test
leo-collins 2581c5c
review suggestions
leo-collins a3ae966
automate docs
leo-collins 940a0d8
review suggestions
leo-collins 3eccf4f
fix
leo-collins 94b3e76
undo API changes
leo-collins File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Just a comment, the Quadrature space may or not enforce the symmetry, but it is always preferable to enforce it. This means that VomOntoVomInterpolator needs to support interpolation of symmetric tensors.
Also related to this, some elements are intrinsically symmetric-valued (all basis functions are symmetric) even when the
ufl_element().symmetry()is None, for example HHJ and Regge. This is similar to the case of intrinsically vector-valued elements like RT, where the basis functions are vector-valued but they don't need aVectorElement.What I am trying to say with this is that when we have intrisic symmetry we can always reduce the size of the Quadrature space by further inspecting the finat elements. But for now, the current approach to construct the Quadrature space seems fine.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Can we turn this into an issue.