Skip to content

Conversation

@tarunteja483
Copy link
Contributor

Rollback Plan

If a change needs to be reverted, we will publish an updated version of the library.

Changes to Security Controls

Are there any changes to security controls (access controls, encryption, logging) in this pull request? If so, explain.

Description

Relations

Closes #0000

References

Output from Acceptance Testing

% make testacc TESTS=TestAccXXX PKG=ec2

...

@tarunteja483 tarunteja483 requested a review from a team as a code owner January 13, 2026 06:34
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

Community Guidelines

This comment is added to every new Pull Request to provide quick reference to how the Terraform AWS Provider is maintained. Please review the information below, and thank you for contributing to the community that keeps the provider thriving! 🚀

Voting for Prioritization

  • Please vote on this Pull Request by adding a 👍 reaction to the original post to help the community and maintainers prioritize it.
  • Please see our prioritization guide for additional information on how the maintainers handle prioritization.
  • Please do not leave +1 or other comments that do not add relevant new information or questions; they generate extra noise for others following the Pull Request and do not help prioritize the request.

Pull Request Authors

  • Review the contribution guide relating to the type of change you are making to ensure all of the necessary steps have been taken.
  • Whether or not the branch has been rebased will not impact prioritization, but doing so is always a welcome surprise.

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

⚠️ Our automation has detected the following potential issues with your pull request


❌ Changelog Entry Required (Click to expand)

The proposed change requires a changelog entry. Please see the Changelog Process section of the contributing guide for information on the changelog generation process.

Tip: This check is not triggered for draft pull requests, since the pull request number is not known until the pull request is opened and is required to create a changelog entry. Opening a pull request first as a draft, adding the requisite changelog entry file, and then marking the pull request as ready for review will prevent future warnings.

@github-actions github-actions bot added needs-triage Waiting for first response or review from a maintainer. tests PRs: expanded test coverage. Issues: expanded coverage, enhancements to test infrastructure. service/billing Issues and PRs that pertain to the billing service. size/M Managed by automation to categorize the size of a PR. labels Jan 13, 2026
@github-actions github-actions bot added the size/L Managed by automation to categorize the size of a PR. label Jan 13, 2026
@justinretzolk justinretzolk added bug Addresses a defect in current functionality. and removed needs-triage Waiting for first response or review from a maintainer. labels Jan 13, 2026
@tarunteja483
Copy link
Contributor Author

This is a duplicate of #45293. Closing this PR.

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

Warning

This Issue has been closed, meaning that any additional comments are much easier for the maintainers to miss. Please assume that the maintainers will not see them.

Ongoing conversations amongst community members are welcome, however, the issue will be locked after 30 days. Moving conversations to another venue, such as the AWS Provider forum, is recommended. If you have additional concerns, please open a new issue, referencing this one where needed.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

bug Addresses a defect in current functionality. service/billing Issues and PRs that pertain to the billing service. size/L Managed by automation to categorize the size of a PR. size/M Managed by automation to categorize the size of a PR. tests PRs: expanded test coverage. Issues: expanded coverage, enhancements to test infrastructure.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants