Skip to content

Conversation

@waywardmonkeys
Copy link
Contributor

Per review comment from Daniel, this isn't needed as we move forward, and if it is, we'll have more work to do fix things. In the meantime, having this here results in incorrect assumptions.

Copy link
Member

@DJMcNab DJMcNab left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This at least accurately reflects the current state, although the rest of the code is still wrong.

See also #1598 (so there's a back-link to this PR)

Per review comment from Daniel, this isn't needed as we move
forward, and if it is, we'll have more work to do fix things.
In the meantime, having this here results in incorrect
assumptions.
@waywardmonkeys waywardmonkeys force-pushed the remove-window_id-from-on_wgpu_ready branch from b0b23f5 to 474b56c Compare January 23, 2026 10:39
@waywardmonkeys waywardmonkeys added this pull request to the merge queue Jan 23, 2026
Merged via the queue into linebender:main with commit 90e748f Jan 23, 2026
17 checks passed
@waywardmonkeys waywardmonkeys deleted the remove-window_id-from-on_wgpu_ready branch January 23, 2026 10:59
@waywardmonkeys waywardmonkeys added the masonry Issues relating to the Masonry widget layer label Jan 23, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

masonry Issues relating to the Masonry widget layer

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants