Skip to content

Conversation

Copy link
Contributor

Copilot AI commented Jan 18, 2026

Comprehensive quality and technical review of the Response Analysis Copilot Tool blog post per custom instructions.

Review Summary

Overall Score: 91/100 - Publication ready, exceeds 80% threshold.

Quality Assessment

Scored across 13 categories:

  • Strengths: Structure (95/100), Depth/Practicality (95/100), Consistency (94/100), Spelling/Grammar (93/100)
  • Notable: Addresses real black-box observability gap in Copilot Studio agent development
  • Architecture: Effective use of Agent SDK + MSAL + Pandas + Gradio with clear Mermaid diagrams

Technical Compliance

All mandatory requirements met:

  • ✅ Filename format: YYYY-MM-DD-topic.md
  • ✅ YAML front matter complete (lowercase categories/tags)
  • ✅ Author kaul-vineet verified in authors.yml
  • ✅ All 4 images exist in /assets/posts/response-analysis-tool/
  • ✅ Alt text present on all media
  • ✅ Closing engagement prompt included

Recommended Enhancements (Optional)

  1. Accessibility: More descriptive alt text for screenshots (describe visible metrics/UI elements)
  2. Audience fit: Add prerequisites section (Python 3.x, async/await, Copilot Studio access)
  3. Grammar: Fix "Chain Of Thoughts" → "Chain of Thought" (line 176)
  4. SEO: Consider additional tags: agent-sdk, monitoring, telemetry

Post provides production-quality tooling with complete working repository, directly addressing developer pain points in agent performance visibility.

Original prompt

review 2026-01-16-response-analysis-copilot-tool.md

Custom agent used: CustomEngineAgent
An agent used to help author blog posts for The Custom Engine.


✨ Let Copilot coding agent set things up for you — coding agent works faster and does higher quality work when set up for your repo.

Copilot AI changed the title [WIP] Review response analysis for copilot tool Blog post review: 2026-01-16-response-analysis-copilot-tool.md Jan 18, 2026
Copilot AI requested a review from kaul-vineet January 18, 2026 07:08
@ChrisGarty ChrisGarty marked this pull request as ready for review January 26, 2026 02:06
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants