Skip to content

Conversation

@datamik
Copy link
Contributor

@datamik datamik commented Jul 14, 2025

Legal Boilerplate

Look, I get it.
Contributing to HOPE Workspace, I retain all rights, title and interest in and to my contributions, and by keeping
this boilerplate intact I confirm that HOPE Workspace can use, modify, copy, and redistribute my contributions,
under HOPE's choice of terms.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jul 14, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 95.41%. Comparing base (bb2fa93) to head (38c0d41).
Report is 4 commits behind head on develop.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff            @@
##           develop     #170   +/-   ##
========================================
  Coverage    95.41%   95.41%           
========================================
  Files          177      177           
  Lines         5580     5580           
  Branches       497      497           
========================================
  Hits          5324     5324           
  Misses         157      157           
  Partials        99       99           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@datamik datamik force-pushed the feature/remove-extra-fields-from-datacheckers branch from 6a4dfd2 to 38c0d41 Compare July 14, 2025 18:59
@datamik datamik requested a review from patsatsia July 14, 2025 20:23
@domdinicola domdinicola merged commit 55f8fbe into develop Jul 15, 2025
13 checks passed
@domdinicola domdinicola deleted the feature/remove-extra-fields-from-datacheckers branch July 15, 2025 08:47
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants